June 2025

__ The June│2025 edition of our Newsletter features the following highlights:

– CVM initiates administrative proceeding against board member for accepting a position at a company deemed a competitor

– Bill No. 1,246/2021 approved: state-owned enterprises must ensure a minimum percentage of women on their boards

_ CVM initiates administrative proceeding against board member for accepting a position at a company deemed a competitor

On June 17, 2025, the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (“CVM”) initiated a sanctioning administrative proceeding to investigate the conduct of a former member of the board of directors of a listed financial institution. The accusation pointed out two potential violations:

  • Conflict of interests: for accepting a position in another company deemed a competitor of the company, in breach of Article 147, paragraph 3, item I, of the Brazilian Corporate Law, combined with Article 17, paragraph 2, item V, of the State-Owned Enterprises Law (Law No. 13,303/16); and

 

  • Breach of the duty of diligence: the director allegedly failed to previously disclose his affiliation with the competing company in the registration form and in his conflict of interest statements, in breach of Article 153 of the Brazilian Corporations Law

In the reporting CVM’ Director vote, Chairman João Pedro Nascimento, was stated that the objective analysis of the business activities of the companies should be carried out to determine whether competition exists, considering the type of product or service offered, even if the companies are not direct competitors in all market segments.

Regarding the allegation of breach of the duty of diligence, he noted that although CVM’s Superintendence of Public Companies (SEP) held the defendant accountable for failing to clearly and precisely disclose his relationship with the competitor in his conflict of interest statements, such lack of detail would not justify administrative liability. He further stated that Article 156 of the Brazilian Corporate Law only requires justification as to the nature and extent of the conflicting interest, providing information necessary and relevant to the resolution at hand, but does not impose an obligation to disclose excessive details about the individual’s occupation, and that while more detailed justifications for the conflict of interest may be desirable from a transparency and corporate governance standpoint, they are not legally required nor mandated by CVM regulation.

Ultimately, the Chairman decided on a penalty of notice of warning for failing to provide sufficient information about his role at the potentially competing company in the Registration Form, but voted to acquit him of the other charges.

The Director Marina Copola agreed with the reporting Director Vote, as did Director João Accioly regarding the acquittals, although Accioly dissented from the imposition of the warning penalty.

The proceeding was suspended following a request for review by Director Otto Lobo.

For further information in Portuguese, please refer to the following link: https://www.gov.br/cvm/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2025/cvm-inicia-julgamento-de-processo-envolvendo-ex-membro-do-conselho-de-administracao-do-banco-de-brasilia-s-a

 

_Bill No. 1,246/2021 approved: state-owned companies must ensure a minimum percentage of women on their boards

On June 24, 2025, the Federal Senate approved Bill No. 1,246/2021, which states that at least 30% of the seats on the boards of directors of state-owned companies, semi-public companies, and their subsidiaries or controlled entities be reserved for women. The bill aims to foster greater gender diversity in public-sector corporate decision-making bodies. The proposal now awaits presidential approval.

The requirement will be implemented gradually as follows:

  • 10% of seats at the first election when the law enters into force;
  • 20% at the second election; and
  • 30% as of the third election onward.

Within the minimum percentage, at least 30% of the seats must be filled by Black women or women with disabilities, in line with affirmative inclusion policies that consider intersectionality

Boards that fail to meet the minimum percentage will be prevented from deliberating on any matter until they are duly regularized. The oversight will be carried out by each federal entity’s internal and external control bodies.

Further information on the Bill is available in Portuguese at the following link:: https://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/159377

Mais clareza para os fatos relevantes

Reforma da norma que trata de divulgação de informações visa reduzir dúvidas e zonas cinzentas.

Posted in: Uncategorized

CVM busca mais segurança jurídica para fatos relevantes

Reforma da norma que trata de divulgação de informações visa reduzir dúvidas e zonas cinzentas.

Posted in: Uncategorized

May 2025

__The May edition│2025 of our Newsletter has the following highlights:

– CVM Starts Public Consultation on Reform of Rules Governing the Disclosure of Material Facts and Market Announcements

– Increase of Corporate Litigation Involving Publicly Held Companies in Brazil

_ CVM Starts Public Consultation on Reform of Rules About the Disclosure of Material Facts and Market Announcements

In accordance with the regulatory agenda of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) for 2025, on May 13, the CVM launched a public consultation regarding the draft regulation intended to replace CVM Resolution No. 44.

The draft introduces significant innovations concerning the disclosure of significant shareholdings and the definitions of the instruments “material fact” and “market announcement,” with the aim of providing greater clarity in the dissemination of information to the market.

Additional proposed amendments include: (i) alignment of the concept of persons acting in concert with the analogous definition set forth in CVM Resolution No. 215; (ii) incorporation into the regulation of guidance contained in a Circular Letter issued by the Superintendence of Company Relations (SEP) regarding the calculation of significant shareholdings; (iii) treatment of the improper disclosure of material facts via Market Announcements; and (iv) reorganization and updates to the regulatory text for the purpose of harmonization.

The public consultation notice is available at the following link: https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/audiencias_publicas/ap_sdm/2025/sdm0125.html. Comments and suggestions may be sent to the following email address:conpublicasdm0125@cvm.gov.br. The deadline for submissions is June 27, 2025.

Further information on the subject is available at: https://www.gov.br/cvm/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2025/cvm-inicia-consulta-publica-sobre-reforma-em-regras-de-divulgacao-de-fatos-relevantes-e-comunicacoes-ao-mercado.

 

_ Increase of Corporate Litigation Involving Publicly Held Companies in Brazil

In times of financial distress or market crises, the volume of corporate litigation tends to rise. Over the past year, 1,760 new cases were filed solely before the 1st Business Law and Arbitration-Related Disputes Court of the São Paulo State Court of Justice (TJSP), representing an 8.4% increase compared to the previous year. The 2nd Business Court of the TJSP recorded 1,782 new filings, an 11.6% increase year-over-year and a 124% increase over the past three years.

Corporate disputes arise from various factors. However, periods of stagnation within companies often coincide with an uptick in shareholder and corporate conflicts. Unlike other types of litigation, corporate disputes frequently extend beyond the judiciary and may give rise to complaints filed with the CVM and other regulatory bodies.

Another relevant factor in the context of corporate litigation is the number of judicial reorganization and bankruptcy filings in the country. Currently, more than 20 companies listed on B3 (the Brazilian stock exchange) are undergoing judicial reorganization proceedings, a situation that may further intensify shareholder conflicts and cause reputational and operational strain on such companies.

For further information on this topic, please refer to the following link: https://valor-globo-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/valor.globo.com/google/amp/empresas/noticia/2025/05/20/cresce-o-numero-de-litigios-que-envolvem-companhias-de-capital-aberto-no-brasil.ghtml.

CVM multa administradora que aprovou as próprias contas

Autarquia considera infração grave o voto da ex-presidente do conselho de administração da Saraiva

Posted in: Uncategorized

March – April 2025

__The March and April edition│2025 of our Newsletter has the following highlights:

– CVM releases 2025 Annual Circular Letter SEP with general guidelines on procedures to be observed by publicly held companies

– Managing partners of limited liability companies are being notified of irregular business closures

_ CVM releases 2025 Annual Circular Letter SEP with general guidelines on procedures to be observed by publicly held companies

On February 27, 2025, the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (“CVM”) issued the 2025 Annual Circular Letter CVM/SEP, aimed at updating general guidelines on procedures to be observed by publicly held companies (“Annual Circular Letter”). 

As customary, the Annual Circular Letter consolidates the main obligations of publicly held companies, reflects regulatory changes, and highlights important decisions of the CVM Board.

This year, the main updates in the Annual Circular Letter relate to the following topics:

 

(i) Guidelines for Shareholders’ Meetings

The Annual Circular Letter provides guidance on the new remote voting rules amended by CVM Resolution No. 204/2024, as well as updated clarifications regarding the Call Notice, Management Proposal, resolutions, and shareholder representation.

 

(ii) Accounting Pronouncement OCPC 10

The Annual Circular Letter also introduces new aspects related to sustainability, specifically regarding the entry into force of CVM Resolution No. 223/24.

 

(iii) Disclosure of Related-Party Transactions

The Annual Circular Letter includes additional guidance on the disclosure of related-party transactions carried out in the previous fiscal year.

 

(iv) Completion of the Reference Form

As in previous years, the Annual Circular Letter provides instructions on completing the Reference Form. The CVM highlighted key points of attention, particularly regarding the adoption of ESG practices and relevant information on executive compensation in case of any changes to the compensation policy or structure that may impact on the same fiscal year.

 

With the Annual Circular Letter, the CVM reinforces its commitment to investor protection and the integrity of the capital markets. The Annual Circular Letter is available at the following link: https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/legislacao/oficios-circulares/sep/oc-anual-sep-2025.html

 

_ Managing partners of limited liability companies are being notified of irregular business closures1

The Office of the Attorney General of the National Treasury (“PGFN”) is expanding its interpretation of what constitutes the irregular dissolution of companies. This change is based on PGFN Ordinance No. 1,160/2024, published in July 2024.

The regulation modernized the Administrative Procedures for Recognition of Liability (“PARR”) and broadened the applicable scenarios, resulting in an increased number of business dissolutions being classified as “irregular.” According to the PGFN, PARRs are measures designed to enhance the efficiency of public debt recovery without burdening the judiciary.

For companies and their managers, however, the consequence of these updates has been a rise in PARR proceedings against managing partners of limited liability companies that have recently undergone corporate dissolution, as well as their inclusion in the Union’s outstanding debt register. The use of an expanded concept to justify the initiation of PARRs has raised concerns, particularly considering the principle of strict legality enshrined in Article 150 of the Federal Constitution. Additionally, the imposition of joint liability and succession has been carried out ex officio, without adherence to the principle of the Natural Judge (responsible for enforcement), due process, and statutory limitation periods.

Despite the illegality of the measures adopted by the PGFN, it is worth noting that in the event of a notification regarding joint liability for irregular dissolution or a protest following inclusion in the outstanding debt register, the partners’ defense may be pursued through a request for review of registered debt (“PRDI”), as provided for in PGFN Ordinance No. 33/2018, without prejudice to any legal actions that the founding partner may initiate in court.

1 Written in collaboration with Pedro Oliveira Roquim, partner at Oliveira Roquim Sociedade de Advogados.