September 2023

_the september│2023 edition of our Newsletter has the following highlight:

– CVM proposes reform in the rules and procedures of shareholders’ general meeting

– Review of the G20/OECD Corporate Governance Principles

– Judicial summons via messaging app may be valid if it provides unequivocal notice of the lawsuit

– Accession of the Fortaleza football team to the Football Joint-Stock Company (Sociedade Anônima do Futebol – SAF)

 

_ CVM proposes reform in the rules and procedures of shareholders’ general meeting

 

The Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (“CVM“) initiated on September 21, 2023, public consultation SDM 01/2023 with proposals for amendments to CVM Resolution No. 81/2022, which set forth the rules and procedures related to shareholders’ general meetings.

 

The proposal provides for the expansion and improvement of the mechanisms of remote participation and voting and is part of the CVM’s regulatory agenda for the year 2023.

 

The main points covered by the amendment proposal are:

 

  • Expansion of the circumstances requiring the disclosure of the remote voting ballot for all shareholders’ meetings, i.e. general, or special, annual or extraordinary;
  • Improvement of the remote voting ballot to incorporate the experience of CVM and the companies from recent years;
  • Inclusion of cases for exemption from the obligation to provide the remote voting ballot, for situations in which shareholders are not using such mechanism; and
  • Adjustments in the transmission flow of voting instructions, in order to optimize the use of the timeframe for collecting, processing and counting votes by the regulated entities involved in the process.

 

Suggestions and comments may be forwarded to the CVM until November 24, 2023.

 

More information about the public consultation SDM 01/2023 can be found in the link below:

https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/audiencias_publicas/ap_sdm/2023/sdm0123.html

 

_ Review of the G20/OECD Corporate Governance Principles

 

On September 11, 2023, the G20 and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) updated the Principles of Corporate Governance to promote corporate sustainability, trust and financial stability. The G20/OECD Corporate Governance Principles, considered to be the international standard for corporate governance, help policymakers assess and improve the legal framework and corporate governance of companies, as well as support market confidence.

 

Revised in 2023 to reflect recent developments in capital markets and corporate governance policies and practices, the update of the Corporate Governance Principles took into consideration, among other aspects:

 

  • sustainability recommendations, including guidelines for dealing with the climate crisis and addressing other risks and/or opportunities;
  • gender equality;
  • concentration of corporate control;
  • encourage the use of technology in corporate governance practices, such as remote and hybrid shareholders’ meetings;
  • the role and rights of shareholders.

 

The Principles are divided into six segments: (i) ensuring a solid corporate governance structure; (ii) rights and equitable treatment of shareholders; (iii) institutional investors, stock markets and other intermediaries; (iv) promoting information disclosure and transparency; (v) defining the obligations and responsibilities of the board of directors; and (vi) emphasizing sustainability.

 

More information on the Corporate Governance Principles can be accessed through the link below:

G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance – OECD

 

_ Judicial summons via messaging app may be valid if it provides unequivocal notice of the lawsuit

 

According to a recent ruling by the Third Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice (“STJ“), the judicial summons via messaging app may be considered valid if it fulfills the purpose of providing the recipient unequivocal notice of the lawsuit filed against them, even if such practice lacks legal basis.

 

In the case decided by the Third Chamber of the STJ, the decision was for the annulment of a summons made via a messaging app, since it was found to have harmed the defendant, as they became absent or in default in the lawsuit.

 

Due to the absence of any legal basis or authorization, Minister Nancy Andrighi, rapporteur of the case, stated that the communication of legal proceedings via messaging app has a defect in terms of form, which could lead to its annulment. Nevertheless, the Minister also concluded that, in the context of civil procedural legislation, the general rule is freedom of forms, and it is necessary to investigate in these situations whether a deviation from the form provided for by law necessarily implies nullity of the act or whether, if the intended purpose is achieved (i.e. effective notification), it could eventually be validated.

 

More information about the aforementioned decision of the STJ can be accessed at the link below:

https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Paginas/Comunicacao/Noticias/2023/22082023-Citacao-por-aplicativo-de-mensagem-pode-ser-valida-se-der-ciencia-inequivoca-da-acao-judicial.aspx

 

_ Celerity of corporate courts

 

A study points out that the average time of processing business lawsuits in specialized courts of the Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo (TJSP) is almost half the time of processing in generalist courts.

 

There are four specialized courts in the State of São Paulo and according to the study, the lawsuits in progress are divided into the following demands:

 

  • 37% are about corporate issues;
  • 23% are related to intellectual property and data protection;
  • 20% correspond to cases of recovery and bankruptcy;
  • 16% are related to contractual disagreements;
  • 3% are arbitration-related topics; and
  • 1% deal with other topics.

 

The central idea of the study was to evaluate whether the main objectives for the creation of such courts are being met, namely: celerity, quality, and predictability. The relevance of this issue lies in the billions of Brazilian Reais involved in the lawsuits and in ensuring legal certainty for investors, since without the business courts, cases of this nature would be distributed to the civil courts, which carry demands of the most varied natures.

 

More information about the study can be accessed in Portuguese through the link below:

https://valor.globo.com/legislacao/noticia/2023/08/01/varas-judiciais-empresariais-sao-mais-celeres.ghtml

 

_ Accession of the Fortaleza football team to the Football Joint-Stock Company (Sociedade Anônima do Futebol – SAF)

 

Fortaleza has just become another Brazilian football team to be framed as SAF. On September 22, 2023, supporters-members and board members voted to amend the bylaws of the Nonprofit Association to transform it into a SAF. In total, 1.256 club members voted, setting a historic recorded for the club in terms of voting participation.

 

The transformation into SAF aims to expand credit lines, implement professional governance models and improve attractiveness for potential investors. This model allows the retention of key decision-making and control of the club’s management, while also giving fans the opportunity to acquire assets of the institution.

 

In addition to the approval of the amendment of the bylaws, the necessary acts to adapt the SAF were carried out, including the election of the members of the Board of Directors and members of the Fiscal Council. There will also be the creation and hiring of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), who will be responsible for the management of all the club’s football-related matters.

 

More information about the SAF of Fortaleza in the link below:

https://ge.globo.com/ce/futebol/times/fortaleza/noticia/2023/09/23/saf-do-fortaleza-e-aprovada-com-1195-votos.ghtml

August 2023

_the august│2023 edition of our Newsletter has the following highlight:

– CVM publishes Guidance Opinion on Soccer Corporations (SAF)

– Real estate companies and equity holdings face unfavorable scenario in judicial disputes over exemption from the ITBI – Tax on the Transfer of Real Estate

– B3 launches new Issuers Regulation

– Celerity of corporate courts

– Electronic signature in Extrajudicial Executive Titles

 

_ CVM publishes Guidance Opinion on Soccer Corporations (SAF)

 

On August 21, 2023, CVM published Guidance Opinion 41, which brings the autarchy’s understanding regarding the rules applicable to Soccer Corporations (“SAF“) that wish to access the capital market to finance their activities.

 

Undoubtedly, the preparation of the Opinion was encouraged by the advent of Law 14.193/2021 (“SAF Law“), which establishes the incorporation of companies whose main activity is the practice of professional soccer and provides for rules regarding incorporation, governance, means of financing soccer activity, treatment of liabilities of sports entities and specific tax regime.

 

Among several relevant aspects of the Guidance Opinion, we highlight its purpose to guide investors and market participants on the use of instruments that enable access to the capital market by SAF, anticipating the expected movements of Brazilian clubs. The opinion presents several instruments available in the market with preliminary guidelines on their access by the FAS, namely:

 

  • Initial public offering (IPO)
  • Bonds (called “Debenture Fut” and provided for in the SAF Law itself)
  • Investment crowdfunding
  • Investment funds
  • Securitization

 

In this sense, the guidance seeks to harmonize the norms and rules provided for in the SAF Law, in the Brazilian Corporate Law, subsidiarily applied to the SAF, and in the regulatory framework of CVM itself, avoiding interpretative normative doubts and, consequently, providing greater legal certainty to investors.

 

CVM reiterated that the autarchy will continue to monitor the matter in Brazil and other markets in order to intensify its understanding of the matter and, eventually, issue new statements.

 

The Guidance Opinion can be accessed in Portuguese through the link below:

https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/legislacao/pareceres-orientacao/pare041.html

 

_ Real estate companies and equity holdings face unfavorable scenario in judicial disputes over exemption from the ITBI – Tax on the Transfer of Real Estate

 

Recently, the interpretation of article 156, paragraph 2, item I of the Federal Constitution, which provides for the exemption from the ITBI (Tax on the Transfer of Real Estate) on the transfer of assets or rights incorporated into the assets of a legal entity in capitalization process and on the transfer of assets or rights arising from merger, spin-off or dissolution of a legal entity, was the subject of discussion by the Federal Supreme Court.

 

The discussion began under Extraordinary Appeal 796.376/SC. The was about a transaction in which part of the equity was destined to the formation of the capital stock and another part was destined to the capital reserve, the interested party intended for the immunity to be applied to the whole amount, and not only in relation to the part that composed the capital.

 

By majority vote, the Supreme Court established the thesis that the exemption from the ITBI does not reach the value of the assets that exceed the limit of the capital stock to be paid, such as those allocated in capital reserve, for example. The judgment did not clarify, however, whether it would be necessary to meet the requirement of preponderant non-real estate activity in order to benefit from the tax exemption. The vote of Justice Alexandre de Morais even mentions that the restriction to the exemption would apply only to cases of merger, spin-off or dissolution of a legal entity.

 

In this scenario, real estate companies and equity holdings have been facing an unfavorable scenario in the judiciary, in which the lower courts have maintained the understanding that the predominance of non-real estate activities is still a condition for the exemption from the ITBI when contributing real estate in the capital stock of a company.

 

However, a recent decision handed down unanimously by the Court of Justice of the Federal District (TJDF) (case no. 0705115-03.2021.8.07.0018) agreed with the understanding of the taxpayers, in the sense that there would be no incidence of ITBI in the contribution of real estate in the capital stock of companies, including real estate holdings.

 

The theme has great relevance and its development before the courts deserves attention, especially to ensure adequate corporate, succession and patrimonial planning.

 

The Extraordinary Appeal 796.376 of the Federal Supreme Court can be accessed in Portuguese through the link below:

https://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=753582490

 

_ B3 launches new Issuers Regulation

 

On August 19, 2023, the new Issuers Regulation launched by B3 entered into force, which replaced, consolidated and improved the rules provided for (i) in the Regulation for Listing of Issuers and Admission to Trading of Securities, and (ii) in the Issuer’s Manual and its respective annexes.

 

Annex B of the new Regulation brought three relevant changes related to ESG measures – Environmental, Social and Governance that must be met, in the “practice or explain” model, by companies already listed in B3. They are:

 

  • Measure ESG 1: Elect as a full member of the board of directors or of the statutory board of directors, at least: (a) 1 woman, and (b) 1 member of an underrepresented community (this being any person who is: “black”, “brown” or “indigenous”, according to the classification presented by the IBGE; member of the LGBTQIA+ community; or person with disabilities, under the terms of Law 13.146/2015). The deadline for adoption for companies already listed will be the mandatory annual update deadline of the reference form (Formulário de Referência) of the year 2025 for one of the criteria and the year 2026 for both criteria.
  • ESG Measure 2: Establish ESG requirements for the appointment of members of the board of directors and the statutory board of directors in the bylaws or in the Nomination Policy considering, at least: (a) complementarity of experiences, and (b) diversity in matters of gender, sexual orientation, color or race, age group and inclusion of persons with disabilities.
  • ESG Measure 3: Establish, in the remuneration policy or practice, performance indicators linked to ESG themes or targets, when there is variable remuneration of the managers. The deadline for adoption for companies already listed of ESG measures 2 and 3 will be the mandatory annual update deadline of the reference form (Formulário de Referência) for the year 2025.

 

The following companies are released from complying with the ESG measures above: (i) registered as category B before CVM; (ii) small sized companies, pursuant to Article 294-B of the Brazilian Corporate Law; (iii) beneficiaries of funds from tax incentives, pursuant to CVM Resolution No. 10; and (iv) Sponsored BDR issuers.

 

In addition, pursuant to article 64, sole paragraph, of the new Regulation, the instruments of investiture of managers shall expressly indicate their subjection to the provisions of the new Regulation.

 

The new Issuers Regulation can be accessed in Portuguese through the following link:

https://www.b3.com.br/data/files/3B/31/0A/CF/394798101DBF7498AC094EA8/Regulamento%20de%20Emissores%20_20.07.2023_.pdf

 

_ Celerity of corporate courts

 

A study points out that the average time of processing business lawsuits in specialized courts of the Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo (TJSP) is almost half the time of processing in generalist courts.

 

There are four specialized courts in the State of São Paulo and according to the study, the lawsuits in progress are divided into the following demands:

 

  • 37% are about corporate issues;
  • 23% are related to intellectual property and data protection;
  • 20% correspond to cases of recovery and bankruptcy;
  • 16% are related to contractual disagreements;
  • 3% are arbitration-related topics; and
  • 1% deal with other topics.

 

The central idea of the study was to evaluate whether the main objectives for the creation of such courts are being met, namely: celerity, quality, and predictability. The relevance of this issue lies in the billions of Brazilian Reais involved in the lawsuits and in ensuring legal certainty for investors, since without the business courts, cases of this nature would be distributed to the civil courts, which carry demands of the most varied natures.

 

More information about the study can be accessed in Portuguese through the link below:

https://valor.globo.com/legislacao/noticia/2023/08/01/varas-judiciais-empresariais-sao-mais-celeres.ghtml

 

_ Electronic signature in Extrajudicial Executive Titles

 

On July 14, 2023, Law No. 14,620 entered into force, which included paragraph 4 to article 784 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), thus considering that in extrajudicial executive titles constituted or attested by electronic means, any type of electronic signature is allowed according to current legislation, and the signature of witnesses to validate these documents is also waived when their integrity is confirmed by a signature provider.

 

Before Law No. 14,620/2023 entered into force, the formalization of contracts, whether in physical or electronic format, required, for the contract to be considered an extrajudicial enforceable title, the signature of the parties, accompanied by two witnesses.

 

In addition, there was a discussion about the possible loss of executive effectiveness of documents signed electronically by a certifying entity not accredited by ICP Brasil. Due to the new wording, the electronic signature of documents through entities not accredited in the Brazilian Public Key Infrastructure – ICP Brasil is now fully valid.

 

Law No. 14,620/2023 can be accessed In Portuguese through the link below:

 

https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2023-2026/2023/Lei/L14620.htm

Estudo da CVM avalia papel do conselho fiscal em empresas menores

Posted in: Uncategorized

Entendendo o Acordo de Acionistas: transparência e direito à informação

Posted in: Uncategorized

July 2023

_the july│2023 edition of our Newsletter has the following highlight:

– Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission study discusses the exemption from mandatory fiscal council in small and medium-sized companies

– Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission discloses its Sanctioning Activity Report for the first quarter of 2023

 

_ Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission study discusses the exemption from mandatory fiscal council in small and medium-sized companies

 

The technical area of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (“CVM”) conducted a study on the possible exemption from appointing a Fiscal Council for small publicly traded companies, i.e., companies with annual gross revenue of up to R$ 500 million, in order to reduce their regulatory costs. The study took into account the costs and benefits of the Fiscal Council, as well as the representativeness of minority shareholders in the supervision of companies and the comparison with other forms of corporate governance.

 

Three main alternatives were analyzed: (i) maintaining the current rule on the mandatory appointment of the Fiscal Council through approval at a general meeting; (ii) waiving the mandatory appointment of the Fiscal Council through approval at a general meeting for all small publicly traded companies; and (iii) waiving the mandatory appointment of the Fiscal Council through approval at a general meeting for all small publicly traded companies, provided that minority shareholders have the right to elect at least one member of the Board of Directors.

 

Based on the results found, the recommendation of CVM’s technical area is to apply the waiver of the obligation to appoint the Fiscal Council via general meeting for all small publicly traded companies, as long as the election of a representative of the minority shareholders on the Board of Directors is ensured.

 

It is important to note that the study indicates that the Fiscal Council can generate benefits in Brazilian companies, given its complementary role with other governance bodies.

 

Finally, CVM clarified that the suggestions and recommendations made in the study do not have a defined deadline to be implemented or debated through public consultation and further regulamentation.

 

The study can be accessed in full through the link below:

 

https://www.gov.br/cvm/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/estudos/air-conselhofiscal-2023.pdf

 

_ Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission discloses its Sanctioning Activity Report for the first quarter of 2023

 

On July 7, 2023, CVM published the Sanctioning Activity Report for the first quarter of 2023, which aims at consolidating information on the agency’s sanctioning activities arising from its supervision, investigation and inspection activities carried out in the prevention or reduction of infractions in the securities market (“Report“).

 

Article 9 of Law No. 6.385/76 establishes in its items V and VI that CVM is responsible for “investigating, through administrative proceedings, illegal acts and unfair practices of managers, members of the fiscal council and shareholders of publicly traded companies, intermediaries and other market participants ” and for the application of the penalties set forth in applicable law against those who committed said illegal acts.

 

Among the sanctioning information for the first quarter of 2023 provided by the Report, we highlight:

 

  • Administrative sanctioning procedures: CVM decided on 7 administrative proceedings, which resulted in the acquittal of 3 persons and in the sanctioning of 25 others, 22 of whom were sanctioned with fines totaling approximately R$6.50 million.

 

  • Terms of Commitment: proposals for terms of commitment relating to 20 proceedings, involving 35 persons and indemnification for damages in the total amount of approximately R$31.80 million, of which 11 were approved by VCM, representing indemnification for damages in the total amount of approximately R$5.05 million.

 

  • Alert orders: 79 alert orders were issued, with the purpose of informing CVM’s regulated entities of irregularities that do not justify the opening of an administrative investigation or the offering of a term of accusation.

 

In addition, the Report highlights the enactment of CVM Resolutions 178 and 179, which establish a new regulatory framework for the investment advisory activity and the transparency in the remuneration practices in the securities intermediation sector.

 

More information on the Report can be accessed through the link below:

 

https://www.gov.br/cvm/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/relatorios/relatorio-de-atividade-sancionadora/relatorio-de-atividade-sancionadora-cvm-2023-1o-trimestre-versao-integral.pdf

Aspectos relevantes sobre a remuneração de administradores de companhias abertas

A fixação da remuneração de administradores de companhias abertas é um tema relevante no direito societário.

Posted in: Uncategorized